The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
Act Now: Contact Your Senators to Protect Future Audiologists
The Senate is expected to vote Thursday, June 25, on the Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution to overturn the Department of Education’s student loan rule….
Join the Next SPAN Meeting on July 22
The Academy’s State Policy Advocate Network (SPAN) will hold its next quarterly meeting on Wednesday, July 22, from 8:00–9:00 pm ET. SPAN provides Academy members…
How Well Do Parents and Professionals Know Their Child’s Cochlear Implant?
Once a child has received cochlear implants (CI), the responsibility of managing and maintaining the implant is upon parents and caregivers. These adults should have…


