The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease with Virtual Reality
In a recent article by Mahato et al. (2026), 250 individuals with Parkinson’s disease were assigned to either traditional physical therapy or virtual reality (VR)-based…
SPAN Q4 Meeting Reminder
The American Academy of Audiology’s State Policy Advocate Network (SPAN) will hold its fourth-quarter meeting next week, on October 28, 2026, from 8:00–9:00 pm ET….
Virginia Audiology Regulations Open for Public Comment
The Virginia Board of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology published a proposed rule allowing for ABA certification to serve as an alternative pathway for audiology licensure….



