The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
Utility of Rotary Chair Testing
In a recent article, Advances in the Clinical Application of Rotational Chair Testing for the Diagnosis and Management of Vestibular Disorders (Ganggang et al., 2026), the…
Congress Averts Government Shutdown Through December
The House voted 370–48 to approve a stopgap funding bill that would keep the federal government operating through December 11, averting a government shutdown before…
Cortical Changes in Total and Partial Vestibular Dysfunction, As Measured by EEG
A recent study by Hadi et al. (2026) analyzed and compared electroencephalogram (EEG) findings in individuals with presumed normal vestibular functions and those with partial…



