The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
When Audiologists Lead, Patients Win
Level Up Your Practice at AAA 2026—Bring Your Assistant and Take Advantage of Exclusive Package Discounts! The Audiology Assistant Track is back by popular demand at AAA 2026,…
Utah Committee Removes Audiology Deregulation Language After Strong Professional Pushback
Early last week, the Utah Office of Professional Licensing Review (OPLR) released draft legislation proposing major revisions to the regulatory framework for licensure of multiple…
Academy Joins National Push for Inclusive Loan Rules for Health Professions
Late last month, the Academy signed onto a letter to the Department of Education and the Reimagining and Improving Student Education (RISE) rulemaking committee urging…


