The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
Changing Seasons, Growing Careers
Even though summers are much warmer and winters are milder, in Minnesota the seasons continue to change—despite global warming. As much as I love summer…
The Clocks Fall Back—Our Infection Control Standards Do Not
Those of us who were in practice during the COVID-19 pandemic remember how vigilant we had to become with our general hand hygiene, surface disinfection…
Black Friday: The Best Value Isn’t in Your Shopping Cart
Black Friday is upon us! That annual celebration of irresistible bargains, overflowing shopping carts, hours of scrolling the online stores and purchases we somehow convince…



