The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
Academy Endorses Congressional Review Act Resolution to Protect Student Access and Workforce Development: Call to Action
The American Academy of Audiology has formally endorsed the Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution introduced by Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and Representative Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR)…
Planting the Seeds of Change
I know it’s an overused cliché, but spring has sprung! Up here in the northern tundra lands of Minnesota, spring is a highly anticipated season…
Better Hearing and Balance Begins with Us!
Spring is here, and you know what that means! I’ll save you the ‘flowery’ tag lines this year, but we would be amiss if we…


