The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
OMB Proposes Major Changes to Federal Grant Management Rules
The Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) proposed revisions to the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200)—the government-wide rules governing federal grants and cooperative agreements—represent…
House FY 2027 LHHS Appropriations Bill Maintains Funding for Hearing Health Priorities, Eliminates PCORI Funding
The House Appropriations Committee has approved its Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies (LHHS) appropriations bill, which provides…
Newborn Hearing Screenings Made Easier: Why Did We Never Think of This?
In the United States, approximately 97 percent of babies born receive a newborn hearing screening (NBHS) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022). There is…


