The current FTC Guides state that “endorsers qualifications must in fact give the endorser the expertise that the endorser is represented as possessing with respect to the endorsement.” The proposed modification of an illustrative example in the Guides implies that an endorser of a hearing aid should not be referred to as “Doctor” as this implies that the endorser is a medical doctor. The text goes on to note that “a non-medical doctor” (e.g., an individual with a Ph.D. in audiology) might be able to endorse the product if the advertisement discloses the nature and limits of the endorser’s experience.
The Academy comments highlight current educational training and scope of practice for audiology in all 50 states and references the 2022 Academy Position Statement that supports the use of the title “doctor” for members who have earned doctoral degrees from accredited institutions, with the provision that the audiologist provide clarification as to which field they hold their doctorate. The Academy letter requests that this illustrative example be amended to reflect this clarification.
Related Posts
CMS Issues Final Rule to Improve Access, Accountability, and Transparency in Medicaid Managed Care
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) recently issued a final rule aimed at improving access to care, accountability and transparency for the more than 70…
April 2024 State Legislative Update
In early April, as 19 state legislatures concluded their sessions for the year, a flurry of legislative activity marked the landscape, particularly in audiology and…
Medicare Advantage Plans Now Required to Inform Beneficiaries of Hearing Benefits
On April 4, 2024, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a final rule that updates the Medicare Advantage Program for 2025. In…